Monday, October 25, 2010

[Shared from Grist.org] Open letter to 1 Sky from the grassroots

Hello, D P W (dianapeiwu@gmail.com) saw this article on Grist and thought
you would enjoy it:

Open letter to 1 Sky from the grassroots
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-10-23-open-letter-to-1-sky-from-the-grassro...


For more environmental news, commentary, features, video, and all-around
green goodness, go to http://www.grist.org/
What the heck is Grist? Learn about us: http://www.grist.org/about

Click the link below or copy-and-paste it into your browser to report this
email as spam or abuse:
http://www.grist.org/?ACT=123&id=7ngcTe&r=dianapeiwu%40gmail.com

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Maddow: Suppression of Black Vote

Maddow rocks. From Thursday, October 21, 2010.

<object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268"><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=ktrk&section=&mediaId=7734060&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&configPath=/util/&site=" ></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true" src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&station=ktrk&section=&mediaId=7734060&cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&configPath=/util/&site="></embed></object>

Houston, TX (Harris County); Wisconsin; Minnesota; Chicago, IL; Nevada

Meroni - the birther lady - is gonna be the one choosing who to dispatch where to police polls - and refers any questions to the head of the RNC. REally?!

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Thursday, October 21, 2010

a different vision of the university

FABULOUS!
Decolonizing the University - February, UC Berkeley, Ethnic Studies

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Mutual Aid Project 3

From my friend Marshall Trammell:

* * * * *

Here are some of our favorite excerpts from my trio the Mutual Aid Project, which began right from the jump as three men of color whose political, spiritual and artistic visions are in one accord and ready for action.

Our mission includes producing Creative Improvised Music as resistance to systems of oppression, proliferating the culture free expression and amending how artists operate in this economy and climate of grassroots activity.

We are reaching out to join/build with a network(s), starting here in Oakland, through acts of solidarity by producing a series of house parties or fund-raising events to support your work.

We see y’all/we are y’all, and this how we get down. Our site is coming soon so let's stay in touch.
mrshl

"so many people have been beaten and deprived as we,
but none of them was real estate."
du bois


"they surprised
when they bring out the beast in us"
fela kuti


"The only places where Negros didn't resist is on the pages of capitalist historians"
C.L.R James


  
Download now or listen on posterous
9.1.2010 MAP Trio.m4a (6732 KB)

  
Download now or listen on posterous
9.8.2010 audio edit1.m4a (14490 KB)

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

For Immediate Release - Shutdown of World’s Largest Waste Incinerator Signals a Change in the Climate

Fabulous! It's happening!

For Immediate Release
October 21, 2010

Contacts:
Sandra Turner Handy: +1.313.926.9811
Margaret Weber: +1.313.938.1133
Ananda Lee Tan: +1.415.374.0615


Shutdown of World’s Largest Waste Incinerator Signals a Change in the Climate

Detroiters rally to urge Detroit Mayor to permanently replace the burner with recycling jobs

Detroit, MI—At 10 a.m. today, Detroiters highlighted the recent closure of the world’s largest waste incinerator with a rally at Hart Plaza, in downtown Detroit. The shutdown of Detroit’s Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator on Oct 8th signals the kind of political shift needed to make the transition from dirty energy to clean jobs, stated members of Zero Waste Detroit, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Global Anti-Incinerator Alliance.

The incinerator has cost Detroiters over 1.2 billion dollars over the past two decades, while many community groups have brought political pressure on the city to stop burning waste. Zero Waste Detroit, a coalition of environmental, labor and faith groups are urging Mayor David Bing to replace the incinerator with a citywide recycling program.

Sandra Turner-Handy of Zero Waste Detroit and the Michigan Environmental Council said, “Communities in Detroit have taken a stand against the violence of pollution and poverty that burning waste brings to their families – so this is a rally for environmental justice.”  She concluded, “We urge Mayor Bing to seize the moment and demonstrate a long-term vision by permanently replacing waste incineration with recycling jobs for our communities.”

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters have also joined Zero Waste Detroit in demanding good, local recycling jobs that reduce toxins and help reclaim a struggling economy.

Celia Petty, Deputy Director of the Teamster’s Waste & Recycling Division pointed out that “Recycling creates six to ten times the number of jobs than incinerators or land-fills. Detroit has wasted more than a billion dollars in the last 20 years to subsidize burning garbage. We need to change that!” She added, “We look forward to working with Mayor Bing, the City Council and Zero Waste Detroit for a solution that creates good, local, union jobs in resource recovery.”

On a June 26 protest, the closing day of the U.S. Social Forum in Detroit, thousands of labor and environmental justice advocates marched and rallied at the incinerator - demanding a closure of the facility, and justice for communities living next to polluting smokestacks across the U.S. Today, local activists relived the moment - with a clear reminder that the issue is not over.
“Detroit can show true leadership by transitioning our city towards clean air, good jobs and justice for all, including incinerator workers and local residents alike,” said Ahmina Maxey of the East Michigan Environmental Action Council and Zero Waste Detroit. “Today, we rallied in solidarity with the dozens of other communities like Ironbound, NJ and Harrisburg, PA that have also shouldered the toxic and financial burdens of incinerators for years.”

The closure of the facility is part of an economic downturn facing the incineration industry due to increased risk, cost and growing public opposition. Like most waste-to-energy facilities, the Detroit incinerator was a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and a toxic burden on community health. For over twenty years this incinerator, co-owned by Covanta Energy and the Energy Investors Funds, has undermined local efforts to reduce, reuse and recycle.

In addition to growing public opposition, a series of economic pitfalls have plagued Covanta in recent months, including: being shut down and sued for excessive pollution by the State of Connecticut; litigation with Harrisburg, Pennsylvania over the State Capitol’s incinerator construction debt; settling a lawsuit over community health impacts in Ironbound, New Jersey; and, having their NYSE stocks downgraded by Bank of America. Yesterday, the Dow Jones newswire reported that the world’s largest waste incinerator company’s quarterly earnings had dropped over 50% due to high operating expenses and weak sales.

Without taxpayer support and state subsidies, incineration cannot compete in the marketplace with real energy and waste solutions. “The reputational risk associated with burning waste has made the incineration industry obsolete,” said Ananda Lee Tan, of the Global Anti-Incinerator Alliance (GAIA), “With the largest waste burner finally down, we look forward to phasing-out the 86 that remain across the country. Detroit should not waste time and resources to revive this dinosaur.”


###
Related Resources:

Websites
Zero Waste Detroit Action Website: http://www.cleanairgoodjobsjustice.org  
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives: http://www.no-burn.org
International Brotherhood of Teamsters: http://www.teamster.org/content/solid-waste

Video
1. Brandy Baker:
2. Alter Echoes: http://alter-echos.org/sur-le-vif/clean-air-good-jobs-justice-for-all/

Photos
1. Ruckus Society:
2. Michigan Teamsters:
3. Global Justice Ecology Project: http://globaljusticeecology.org/photo_gallery.php?catID=43&ID=356

News Stories
1. Detroit Metro Times: Detroit Incinerator Snuffed: http://www.metrotimes.com/news/snuffed-1.1047706
2. Climate Connections: Detroit Incinerator Action:
    http://climatevoices.wordpress.com/2010/06/26/photo-essay-detroit-incinerator-action/
3. Wall Street Journal: Harrisburg Council Steps Toward Bankruptcy As Option:
     http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100929-710824.html
4. New Jersey News: Covanta Shut Down and Sued for Pollution by Connecticut Attorney General:
    http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2010/08/fairfield-based_covanta_sued_f.html


Available for Interview List Attached

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Updates on climate negotiations on the way into Cancun

Hey all!

Just back from an intense week of media & networking:

  • a media event around Prop 23 in California in Wilmington, CA in conjunction with Communities for a Better Environment, headlined by the youth, and featured in the LA Times and the Daily Breeze;
  • Tweeting from Bioneers to increase the visibility of our friends in the Indigenous Tent and the Eco-Justice events at Bioneers;
  • and assisting the formation and formulation of the Youth for Climate Justice network, a national network of youth and youth organizers and young people from around the US coming together to increase the voices of impacted communities from the South in the North in international and national climate policy negotiations - and the knowledge on climate justice in our own communities at home.
This is good news for those of us who were present in Cochabamaba formulating these positions that are now strengthened by the Bolivian and ALBA countries' positions in climate talks:

Communique by the Plurinational State of Bolivia

(October 10, 2010 – Tianjin, China) The proposals of the World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth have been maintained and expanded upon in the new negotiating text on climate change that emerged from the last round of negotiations in Tianjin, China.

Throughout the process in Tianjin, attempts were made to substitute the negotiating text, which contains the positions of all countries, with a text that would be limited to recognizing the principal elements of consensus for Cancun.

In some working groups, such as the one dealing with “various approaches for mitigation actions,” a proposal was presented which only contained the pro-market option. Following a long debate in which the right of all countries to have their proposals reflected in the negotiating text until a consensus is reached ultimately prevailed, a new text was agreed upon. That text now includes, among various options, the position of Cochabamba against the carbon market, and a passage asserting that the rights of nature must be recognized in mitigation actions.
Likewise, in the “shared vision” group, a proposal to consider the impacts of war on greenhouse gas emissions was introduced. Support was garnered among many delegations for a critique of market mechanisms related to forests and the need for a more integral view of forests.

In the last plenary, an intense debate took place due to the appearance of texts from facilitators of some groups that had not been previously discussed. It was made clear, though, that the entire negotiating text that emerged from Bonn, as well as the advances made in Tianjin, will continue to serve as the base for negotiations in Cancun.

The negotiating text that will be taken up in Cancun includes, among other elements, the following proposals from Cochabamba:

Limit the temperature increase to 1°C.
Reduce emissions by more than 50% for 2017.
Rights of Mother Earth.
Full respect for human rights and the rights of indigenous peoples and climate migrants.
Formation of an International Climate Justice Tribunal.
No new carbon markets.
6% of GDP in developed countries to finance climate change actions in developing countries.
Lifting of barriers to intellectual property that facilitates technology transfer.
No commodification of forests.
In Tianjin, advances were made in the institutional framework regarding financing, technology transfer and adaptation. However, on the principal issue of emissions reductions under the Kyoto Protocol, no advances were made with regard to the offers made by developed countries supporting a temperature increase of 3° to 4°C.

The situation ahead of Cancun is extremely worrying. There exists the very real danger that a text could be imposed at the last minute that was not negotiated and agreed upon by all parties. Similarly, there is the risk that the treatment of substantive themes such as emissions reductions and the maintenance of the Kyoto Protocol could be postponed until South Africa or beyond.

There is also enormous pressure by developed countries to give the green light to new carbon market mechanisms, particularly in relation to forests. In this context, the only way to advance toward a satisfactory result is by strengthening the organization and mobilization of social movements, environmentalists, indigenous peoples, women, intellectuals, artists, youth and the people as a whole behind the banner of the “People’s Agreement” of Cochabamba.

This post is also available in: Spanish

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Monday, October 18, 2010

VICTORY! Canada-US pipeline on hold amid oil's recent woes

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/article_3f6b0e6a-da3a-11df-84f9-001cc4c03286.html


Canada-US pipeline on hold amid oil's recent woes


BISMARCK, N.D. — The steel is staged, and crews are waiting to lay the last and most expensive leg of TransCanada Corp.'s multibillion-dollar pipeline network that would carry Canadian oil to refineries along the Gulf Coast.

Yet final U.S. government approval for the massive project, once assumed to be on a fast track, is now delayed indefinitely, with little official explanation. The company had hoped to begin laying pipe by the end of the year, but those prospects have dimmed.

Some experts conclude the negative publicity surrounding oil-related disasters, particularly the offshore BP leak that polluted the Gulf Coast for months, has made the Keystone XL pipeline a victim of guilt by association.

"I think it's fair to speculate that BP fouled the nest for TransCanada," said Richard Fineberg, a pipeline analyst with Ester, Alaska-based Research Associates. "There is much more attention to the industry and its dark side. It's going to be harder to get things done at this moment."

If the Calgary-based company is battling poor timing on this leg of the project, it enjoyed much better timing during the previous leg. The Keystone pipeline — separate from Keystone XL albeit part of the same 3,800-mile underground network — sailed through the approval process when Americans were clamoring for the government to do something about record gas prices.

The delay is frustrating for some business and labor leaders who were counting on the new revenues from the pipelines.

"I think all that safety stuff has already been done by now. Let's do something," said Ken Mass, president of the Nebraska AFL-CIO.

The massive pipeline network — about five times the length of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline — is designed to move 1.5 million barrels of Canadian oil daily to U.S. refineries.

TransCanada won approval two years ago for the first Keystone pipeline, which carries crude oil across Saskatchewan and Manitoba and through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois.

Oil began coursing through the 36-inch Keystone pipeline in June, and it appeared that permitting and construction would go as slickly for TransCanada's Keystone XL. That $7 billion leg of the system is designed to carry crude oil from tar sands near Hardisty, Alberta, to the Gulf Coast via Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas.

Because both pipelines cross the U.S.-Canadian border, presidential permits from the State Department are required. But department officials have given no signal about when they might approve the final permit for Keystone XL, despite enthusiastically touting the Keystone pipeline as a project with little opposition when it was at this stage three years ago.

"I don't know that it was expected to take this long, but it's not a simple process," State Department spokesman Bill Cook said last week. "It's cross-border, across several states, and all these interests have to be reconciled."

In April, the State Department published a draft report giving the Keystone XL pipeline a favorable environmental score, but that was just days before the Gulf Oil spill hit. Other oil-related disasters followed, including Enbridge Inc.'s broken pipeline that spilled hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.

Some elected officials and federal agencies have expressed skepticism about the positive environmental findings. The Environmental Protection Agency called the State Department's review inadequate, while the Department of Energy concluded Keystone XL couldn't act as a safeguard against global price shocks.

Crude for the pipeline comes from oil sands, a tar-like bitumen that is mined or extracted by using steam injected in the ground. Refining the oil creates more greenhouse gases than traditional crude, leading opponents to argue that it doesn't justify the fuel produced.

Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., sent a letter last week to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton questioning whether alternative routes were considered that would have been less environmentally risky.

House Energy Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., has argued that using crude oil from the Alberta tar sands would increase greenhouse gas emissions.

TransCanada insists the pipeline won't harm the environment but will deliver a dependable source of oil to the U.S. from a friendly trading partner. Still, company officials acknowledge recent oil spills have brought more scrutiny to Keystone XL.

Keystone spokesman Terry Cunha said the only difference between the two pipelines is the routes.

"It's the same kind of pipeline and the same kind of oil," Cunha said.

Not everyone is alarmed by the delay. Kevin Cramer, chairman of the agency that regulates North Dakota's pipeline industry, speculates offshore drilling fears may actually help get Keystone XL and other U.S. pipelines built.

"I think we will be seeing a lot more onshore investment and that onshore crude would be coming to the same ports that the offshore crude would be coming," said Kevin Cramer, chairman of the North Dakota Public Service Commission.

Opponents of the Keystone XL project describe the 1,980-mile pipeline as an ecological disaster waiting to happen, and land owners are angry that TransCanada has threatened to use eminent domain to obtain the easements it needs for the project.

"We really see this pipeline as a problem that's bad for people at every step of the route," said Alex Moore, spokesman for Friends of the Earth.

TransCanada says Keystone XL would inject more than $20 billion in new spending into the U.S. economy and about $585 million in state and local taxes to the six states along the pipeline's path.

Some residents still aren't convinced, including Janie Capp, whose eastern North Dakota farm sits above the Keystone pipeline. She calls the entire system a "risky experiment."

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

UN Convention on Biological Diversity Meets in Japan to Decide How to Enhance Corporate Profits Through Marketing of Biodiversity

by Anne Petermann, Executive Director, Global Justice Ecology Project and North American Focal Point of Global Forest Coalition

Governments from all over the world are gathering in Nagoya, Japan for the next two weeks to discuss the creation of a new 10 year plan for “biodiversity conservation” at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity’s tenth bi-annual Conference of the Parties (COP-10) though the development of a “green economy.”

Activists, non-governmental organizations and Indigenous Peoples from around the globe are also participating in COP-10 to ensure that these strategies created to supposedly protect biodiversity focus on enhancing the rights of peoples with biodiversity-rich lands and do not impact negatively on biodiversity or these peoples by forcing them into the free market.

“There’s so much at stake here for the world’s small scale farmers, fishers and Indigenous Peoples.  They’re at the frontlines of preserving biodiversity and knowledge of that diversity,” said Chee Yoke Ling of Third World Network.

COP-10 is also drawing increased attention due to its attempt to collaborate with the UN Climate Convention on schemes such as REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation).  REDD has been highly controversial because of its aim to put forests into the carbon market and to use forests to offset industrial emissions in the North.  Indigenous Peoples around the world have been highly critical of REDD due to the fact that it is already leading to massive land grabs by corporations who see the future economic return from controlling large areas of forests.  This has led to the displacement of the very communities that protected those forests.

COP-10 will also look at the impacts on forests from other climate mitigation strategies, such as biofuels and bioenergy.  The rapid advance of biofuels as a supposed solution to climate change, for example, has led to the widespread conversion of forests into biofuel crops–which has worsened climate change and caused huge losses of biodiversity.  The growing demand for wood to burn for electricity production is also driving destruction of native forests and is even being used as an excuse for the commercialization of fast-growing genetically engineered trees, all of which will also worsen climate change, not to mention devastate biodiversity.  Profit-making and protection of biodiversity are directly opposed and can never be reconciled.

Because of this focus on climate strategies, however, COP-10 is being considered a crucial step on the road to Cancun (where the UN Climate Conference will take place in December).

“New and Innovative?”

Another highly controversial piece of the negotiations in Nagoya will be the creation of “new and innovative” financial mechanisms for biodiversity protection.

In particular, the CBD is taking failed models created by the UN Climate Convention for use in biodiversity conservation.  One such model is the carbon market.  By putting a monetary value on biodiversity, as was done with carbon, the idea is there will be more incentive to protect it.   Carbon markets, however, have done nothing to curb carbon emissions, and are rampant with crime, corruption and incompetance.  Biodiversity is even harder to measure than carbon and creating a market in it will be utterly ineffective in protecting it.

The CBD Alliance points out, “the move toward market approaches is about privatizing and commodifying peoples’ commons and bypassing governance systems in the South, in order to achieve ‘northern style’ conservation.”  Northern style conservation refers to the NGO-Imperialist model of “protecting” land by kicking out the communities that live there.

The mechanisms for putting biodiversity into the markets include the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program (BBOP), which is being overseen by Conservation International, and the Green Development Mechanism–modeled after the disastrous Clean Development Mechanism of the UN Climate Convention.  Both of these models will enhance the ability of corporations to destroy biodiversity by allowing them to purchase so-called “biodiversity offsets.”  The main goal of biodiversity offsets is to continue business as usual while pretending to be green, which is why BBOP members include Rio Tinto mining company, Shell and Chevron.

Biodiversity offsets justify, and will escalate, destruction of biodiversity.  Biodiversity offsets allow a company like International Paper to clearcut a native forest in one place as long as they ‘protect’ one somewhere else.  Biodiversity offsets result in a net loss of biodiversity.  The offset model–whether carbon or biodiversity–goes completely against science and common sense.

But then common sense has never been a real strong point of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity…

Note: Anne Petermann will be blogging from Nagoya throughout the first week of the COP-10 for the Climate Connections blog: http://climatevoices.wordpress.com

Article source: GJEP Climate Connections Blog

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Pollution Kills: Wilmington, CA, Part II

Pollution Kills: Wilmington, CA, Part I

Wilmington, CA - The pipeline runs directly through the community from the refineries. The youth made some powerful signs. most of the residents have, or know someone who has, severe asthma and/or cancers. Most people suspect that this is related to the concentration of refineries in the area (4 in Wilmington and 3 in Carson). When the youth from Southeast LA rolled up, some of them had troubles breathing. All of us who are not from WIlmington all felt the impacts of breathing that air.

The workers in the refineries also know about the cost of pollution - on their own bodies. Families and local community members at the rally. Mary Cervantes, local Wilmington resident Mary Cervantes has lived in Wilmington, CA all her life. She has stage 4 cancer. First, it took several years before her cancer of the kidneys was even diagnosed by the doctors - they kept misdiagnosing the symptoms as menopause. Then, after they removed one kidney, about a year later, she was found to have cancer in her liver - and they cannot remove the liver. So she lives with this cancer, and takes medicines which make her feel sick, in addition to the medical treatments during which she often was so tired that she could not leave her house, and so forth. She lost an incredible amount of weight during treatment. These are the costs of this pollution in the community. A neighbor has had a breast removed, others also have cancers. In fact, when Mary went to the UCLA hospital, in the basement, she said that the people in there are from Wilmington, Carson, Long Beach. Most people in the neighborhood suspect that these illnesses are due to the chemicals emitted from the refineries. 

When asked what she thought the impact on her community would be if Prop 23 passes, she said, " I think it will be the end of future generations. They will be sick with asthma, with cancer." And she said, "I do this for the community - for my neighbors, the future generations, our kids and grandkids. I am strong and I will fight, because we have to."

 

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

A Sample of No on Prop 23 Rally Photos

Wilmington, CA

Communities United Against Prop 23 - http://www.communitiesagainstprop23.com

Communities for a Better Environment

Communities for a Safe Environment

Greenlining

Ella Baker Center

Coalition for a Safe, Sustainable California

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Breaking News! Detroit Incinerator Snuffed

Breaking News! Detroit Incinerator Snuffed

In June, following the US Social Forum, hundreds of activists in Detroit marched against this incinerator.  Now it has been shut down.

------------------------

The trash burner in Detroit has been turned off - for now.  On Friday
October 8, 2010 the Detroit incinerator shutdown from "economic
factors".  It has been a financial failure, an environmental failure,
a public health failure, a public services failure, a city budget
failure - a failure by undermining the fundamental needs and rights of
the people of Detroit.
-Brad van Guilder, Ph. D.
Ecology Center - SE MI Organizer
For the entire story about the incinerator shut down, 
click here

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Friday, October 1, 2010

Unsung Heroes of the BP Spill: Vietnamese American Youth

A sophisticated community response!

Unsung Heroes of the BP Spill: Vietnamese American Youth

Sarah Damian, New America Media

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 (New America Media) - High school senior Anna Nguyen already had her hands full applying to colleges. Then the BP spill occurred, and suddenly the Louisiana 17-year-old had another priority: helping her family to recover from her father’s sudden loss of income.

“It’s been hard for my dad to find a new job because most of his life he’s been self-employed as a fisherman, even before he came to the United States,” Anna explained Friday.



0diggsdigg
vote
now
Buzz up!


Although her father is receiving a monthly $5,000 check from BP, a huge chunk goes to medical bills—he is diabetic and Anna’s mother has osteoporosis. Anna’s mother, meanwhile, brings in some income from her job at a tea and coffee factory, where she works six days a week.

Anna, a member of the Vietnamese American Young Leaders Association of New Orleans (VAYLA-NO), was in the nation’s capital to mark the 100th day of the oil spill and to publicize the plight of the Vietnamese-American fishing community in the wake of the disaster. These days, she said, one of her chief responsibilities is guiding her family through the complicated claims process.

“Me and my sister are doing the application for my dad,” she said, “and it’s hard to translate from Vietnamese to English when we don’t know what the settlement is about.”

As their immigrant elders struggle to come to terms with the oil catastrophe, it is young people like Anna who are taking a lead role, forcing BP and the federal government to pay more attention to the needs of the Vietnamese community, said Minh Nguyen, VAYLA’s 25-year-old founder and executive director.

A $20 billion Gulf Coast Claims Fund will be distributed to victims, he said, but it’s unclear how the independent administrator, Kenneth Feinberg, will allocate the money.

At a recent community forum that discussed this new claims system, Minh Nguyen asked if Feinberg had any Vietnamese Americans on staff, since they represent one-third of Gulf Coast fishermen. Feinberg said no.

“There’s going to be a three-member panel to give the appeals, so we think it’s right to have someone who is culturally competent on the panel,” Minh Nguyen said at Friday’s community briefing in the U.S. Capitol, hosted by VAYLA and the Union of North American Vietnamese Student Associations (uNAVSA). “And it would be great if it was a Vietnamese American,” he added.

Already, the claims process has been difficult for many. “It was really challenging for Vietnamese fisher folks to put in a claim because they didn’t speak the language and weren’t prepared,” he said.

“We must approach this crisis with a multi-generational response,” added uNAVSA’s program director, Dan Nguyen. “Because not only does this affect the current generation, but future generations of Vietnamese Americans in the Gulf Coast.”

VAYLA has been working hard bringing attorneys to New Orleans to help the fishermen learn about filing claims and understand their rights. Minh Nguyen said the group has received a grant to pay a full-time staffer to provide legal education services.

Miya Chen, with the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, thanked the young people for sharing their stories and welcomed their input on the issues they’ve been dealing with in New Orleans. “D.C. can be very disconnected to what’s happening on the ground, but this administration is listening to your voices,” she said.

“In Vietnamese tradition, the 100th day after the passing of a loved one is marked as a sacred day of commemoration,” said Song Park, campaign director of VAYLA. “We observe today as the 100th day after thousands of fishermen in the Gulf Coast have lost their livelihood to the oil disaster.”

# # #

Reposted from: http://us.oneworld.net/article/369426-unsung-heroes-bp-spill-vietnamese-american-youth

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism