Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Evo Morales letter on REDD: NATURE, FORESTS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ARE NOT FOR SALE

The word from Bolivia: 

This is interesting as there is a pre-meeting of indigenous peoples this week in Cancun, which some view as a probable attempt to divide the Indigenous Peoples' Caucus on the issue of REDD.

Stay tuned.

--------------------

NATURE, FORESTS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ARE NOT 
FOR SALE  

 

Indigenous brothers of the world:  

 

I am deeply concerned because some pretend to use leaders and indigenous 
groups to promote the commoditization of nature and in particular of forest 
through the establishment of the REDD mechanism (Reduction Emissions from 
Deforestation and Degradation) and its versions REDD+ REDD++.  
Every day an extension of forests and rainforest equivalent to 36,000 football 
fields disappears in the world.  Each year 13 million hectares of forest and rain 
forest are lost. At this rate, the forests will disappear by the end of the century.  
The forests and rainforest are the largest source of biodiversity. If deforestation 
continues, thousands of species, animals and plants will be lost forever. More 
than three quarters of accessible fresh water zones come from uptake zones in 
forests, hence the worsening of water quality when the forest condition 
deteriorates. Forests provide protection from flooding, erosion and natural 
disasters.  They provide non-timber goods as well as timber goods. Forests are 
a source of natural medicines and healing elements not yet discovered. Forests 
and the rainforest are the lungs of the atmosphere.  18% of all emissions of 
greenhouse gases occurring in the world are caused by deforestation.  
 
It is essential to stop the destruction of our Mother Earth.  

 

Currently, during climate change negotiations everyone recognizes that it is 
essential to avoid the deforestation and degradation of the forest. However, to 
achieve this, some propose to commoditize forests on the false argument 
that only what has a price and owner is worth taking care of.  
Their proposal is to consider only one of the functions of forests, which is 
its ability to absorb carbon dioxide, and issue "certificates", "credits" or 
"Carbon rights" to be commercialized in a carbon market.  This way, 
companies of the North have the choice of reducing their emissions or buy 
“REDD certificates" in the South according to their economic convenience.  
 For example, if a company has to invest USD40 or USD50 to reduce the 
emission of one ton of C02 in a "developed country",  they would prefer to buy a 
"REDD certificate" for USD10 or  USD20 in a "developing country", so they can 
they say they have fulfilled to reduce the emissions of the mentioned ton of 
CO2.   
Through this mechanism, developed countries will have handed their obligation 
to reduce their emissions to developing countries, and the South will once 
again fund the North and that same northern company will have saved a lot of 
money by buying "certified" carbon from the Southern forests.  
However, they will not only have cheated their commitments to reduce 
emissions, but they will have also begun the commoditization of nature
with the forests 

 

The forests will start to be priced by the CO2 tonnage they are able to absorb. 
The "credit" or "carbon right" which certifies that absorptive capacity will be 
bought and sold like any commodity worldwide. To ensure that no one affects 
the ownership of “REDD certificates” buyers, a series of restrictions will be put 
into place, which will eventually affect the sovereign right of countries and 
indigenous peoples over their forests and rainforests. So begins a new stage 
of privatization of nature never seen before which will extend to water, 
biodiversity and what they call “environmental services".   
While we assert that capitalism is the cause of global warming and the 
destruction of forests, rainforests and Mother Earth, they seek to expand 
capitalism to the commoditization of nature with the word “green 
economy".  

 

To get support for this proposal of commoditization of nature, some financial 
institutions, governments, NGOs, foundations, "experts" and trading 
companies are offering a percentage of the "benefits" of this 
commoditization of nature to indigenous peoples and communities living in 
native forests and the rainforest.  

 

Nature, forests and indigenous peoples are not for sale.  

 

For centuries, Indigenous peoples have lived conserving and preserving natural 
forests and rainforest. For us the forest and rainforest are not objects, are not 
things you can price and privatize. We do not accept that native forests and 
rainforest be reduced to a simple measurable quantity of carbon. Nor do 
we accept that native forests be confused with simple plantations of a 
single or two tree species. The forest is our home, a big house where plants, 
animals, water, soil, pure air and human beings coexist.  

 

It is essential that all countries of the world work together to prevent forest and 
rainforest deforestation and degradation. It is an obligation of developed 
countries, and it is part of its climate and environmental debt climate, to 
contribute financially to the preservation of forests, but NOT through its 
commoditization. There are many ways of supporting and financing developing 
countries, indigenous peoples and local communities that contribute to  
the preservation of forests.  

 

Developed countries spend tens of times more public resources on defense, 
security and war than in climate change. Even during the financial crisis many 
have maintained and increased their military spending.  It is inadmissible that 
by using the needs communities have and the ambitions of some leaders 
and indigenous "experts", indigenous peoples are expected to be 
involved with the commoditization of nature.  
 
All forests and rainforests protection mechanisms should guarantee indigenous 
rights and participation, but not because indigenous participation is 
achieved in REDD, we can accept that a price for forests and rainforests is 
set and negotiated in a global carbon market. 
Indigenous brothers, let us not be confused. Some tell us that the carbon 
market mechanism in REDD will be voluntary. That is to say that whoever wants 
to sell and buy, will be able, and whoever does not want to, will be able to stand 
aside.  We cannot accept that, with our consent, a mechanism is created 
where one voluntarily sells Mother Earth while others look crossed 
handed  
 
Faced with the reductionist views of forests and rainforest commoditization, 
indigenous peoples with peasants and social movements of the world must fight 
for the proposals that emerged of the World People's Conference on Climate 
Change and the Rights of Mother Earth: 

 

1) Integrated management of native forests and rainforest not only considering 
its mitigation function as CO2 sink but all its functions and potentiality, whilst 
avoiding confusing them with simple plantations.  

 

2) Respect the sovereignty of developing countries in their integral management 
of forests.  

 

3) Full compliance with the Rights of Indigenous Peoples established by the 
United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Convention No. 
169 of the ILO and other international instruments; recognition and respect to 
their territories; revalorization and implementation of indigenous knowledge for 
the preservation of forests;  indigenous peoples participation and indigenous 
management of forest and rainforest.  

 

4) Funding of developed countries to developing countries and indigenous 
peoples for integral management of forest as part of their climate and 
environmental debt. No establishment of any mechanism of carbon markets or 
"incentives" that may lead to the commoditization of forests and rainforest.  

 

5) Recognition of the rights of Mother Earth, which includes forests, rainforest 
and all its components.  In order to restore harmony with Mother Earth, putting a 
price on nature is not the way but to recognize that not only human beings have 
the right to life and to reproduce, but nature also has a right to life and to 
regenerate, and that without Mother Earth Humans cannot live.  

 

Indigenous brothers, together with our peasant brothers and social movements 
of the world, we must mobilize so that the conclusions of Cochabamba are 
assumed in Cancun and to impulse a mechanism of RELATED ACTIONS TO 
THE FORESTS based on these five principles, while always maintaining high 
the unity of indigenous peoples and the principles of respect for Mother Earth, 
which for centuries we have preserved and inherited from our ancestors. 

 

 

EVO MORALES AYMA 

President of the Plurinational State of Bolivia 

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Monday, September 27, 2010

Farmers and Peasants in Indonesia!

Well, today I had fun learning how to add a blog and organizational roll to my blog, install Google Analytics, and other housekeeping.

Also made some connections to some international organizations to support the new national youth coalition I've been helping to organize, as well as for the national coalitions on climate justice, and also linking to some pretty amazing media outlets who cover progressive social movements.

Edited one report, and editing the other as we speak.

I love my work.

* * * * *


Farmers march in Jakarta:

Paving the way for genuine agrarian reform

 

JAKARTA. Some 20-thousands peasants from all across Indonesia marked the 50th commemoration of the National Farmers’ Day on Sept. 24. Half of the number chooses to rally along Jakarta on that day, focusing to the Presidential Palace.


These parallel actions all across Indonesia were organized by 44-organizations, mostly farmers’ organizations, to remind President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono that he made a speech on 2007 saying that the government was to pursue agrarian reform. “No implementation of the program whatsoever until now,” said Henry Saragih, chairman of the Indonesian Peasant Union.


Meanwhile, there are 9.6 million hectares of unclaimed land ready to be redistributed to the people. The government seems only focusing on “market-led agrarian reform”, as advised by the World Bank from 1999 to 2004. This includes titling, cadasters and land registries. Of course it fails to adhere with the problems of food sovereignty, human rights (most notably the rights to land), and furthermore—justice. 


The peasants lament the inequalities in land ownership that have been disparate for decades. “Yes, the number of land conflicts has been in decline since 2009, however, the total area of land involved in conflicts is on the rise, increasing more than six fold to 328,000 hectares from 49,000 hectares in 2008,” Henry Saragih further claimed. The expansion of plantations and estates by the government and private sectors also played role in those dark statistics. Landlessness and land-poor are huge problems, with 25.6 million family farmers who only have an average of 0.4 hectare of land.


In the Presidential Palace, some farmers met with some presidential staffs. They discussed 9 demands on how the agrarian reform program should be implemented by the government. How to implement a genuine agrarian reform by redistributing 9.6 million hectares is on the top list. Peasants also asked the government to create a national ad-hoc committee on agrarian conflict, and reviewing some 14 national regulations that are not in favor of their rights.


“The government has to go back to the right track of agrarian reform, “ say one protester. “The president has to be firm, leading the country for a genuine agrarian reform—that could be the revival of this nation,” say another one. Head of National Land Agency, Joyo Winoto, said that 360,000 hectares of land are ready to be redistributed this year. Nonetheless, many regulations are still not synchronized with this effort. “This should be one of the government’s focuses—at least until 2014,” add Henry.


This years’ commemoration of National Farmers’ Day is a real celebration of peasants, indigenous people, agricultural workers, the land-poor and the landless. Fifty years ago, Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA 1960) mandated the “land to the tiller” principle. It is one of the good pieces of legislation that has not been implemented until now.


The ball is now on the government’s court. One thing that is crucial, said Henry is that this agrarian reform program will be nothing if it does not involve the people. “Okay, we appreciate the government’s commitment for agrarian reform. But we have to make sure that we are the beneficiaries and we get the right to land in order to produce food,” he concluded after the meeting in Presidential Palace. 


===

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

UN sets out seven objectives for Cancún climate talks

Was just on a US state department briefing call on climate change. Sociologically fascinating. Would have liked to hear more details about how US policy negotiations at the international level will help or hurt efforts at equity-and-sustainability that are currently being implemented in cities nationwide.

This article uses the Copenhagen Accord. Disturbing.

In positive news, there are fabulous coalitions of grassroots and professional groups in the United States who are developing local solutions on mitigation and adaptation, as well as planning on their work in relationship to policy neogitations on climate change and equity at their local, state, regional, national and in the international treaty-making processes. How often are the people who are the developers and implementers of solutions, who come from the poorest communities and regions in our country, also on the frontlines of making and negotiating policy? Impressive and powerful.

Happy Monday!

---------- Forwarded message ----------

http://www.environmental-finance.com/news/view/1324

UN sets out seven objectives for Cancún climate talks
23 September 2010

The Cancún climate talks could realistically make progress in seven areas, according to a leading UN climate official.

Halldor Thorgeirsson, director of Bali Road Map Support at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change secretariat, said that the talks, in Mexico in December, will be a "test of procedure" for climate negotiations following last year's meeting in Copenhagen that was characterised by disunity among nations.
 
Addressing a conference at Chatham House in London today, he called for “a paradigm shift” away from the attitude that "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed" towards "nothing is agreed until enough is agreed".
 
Thorgeirsson identified seven areas where progress could be made in Cancún:

  1. Formalising pledges to mitigate climate change, made for example in the Copenhagen Accord;
  2. Putting in place a system for measuring, reporting and verifying efforts to mitigate emissions, and financial support for those efforts;
  3. Establishing a framework for adaptation;
  4. Agreeing a fund for mitigation and adaptation activities, putting in motion the design of that fund and an agreement for its oversight;
  5. Putting in place the infrastructure needed to deliver funds for mitigation and adaptation, and establishing a registry for developing countries' 'nationally agreed mitigation actions';
  6. Establishing a global goal – most likely to limit global temperature rise to 2°C – and a process for measuring progress towards and reviewing that goal; and
  7. Launching of a “readiness phase” for a mechanism to direct finance to reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation.

"This is a realistic assessment of what could be achieved," he said. "The essence really is long-term finance and delivery of short-term finance."
 
Thorgeirsson cautioned that assigning responsibility for emission cuts "won't hap pen in Cancún" and continuing to negotiate emission reduction targets "delays delivery on action".
 
"But, at the same time, we need to avoid a gap” between the end of the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period, at the end of 2012, and whatever comes after, and “ensure continuation of the carbon markets”.
 

# # #

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

AUSTRALIA: Activists shut down world’s biggest coal port

interesting news. From Black Mesa to Appalachia to Australia ...

* * * * 

Activists shut down world’s biggest coal port
Posted: 26 September, 2010 by withoutyourwalls in Uncategorized

5:30am, Sunday 26th September 2010:

Global warming activists have shut down operations at all three coal terminals in the Port of Newcastle, Australia, the world’s largest exporter of coal.

At dawn this morning, teams of people entered the three coal terminals in Newcastle. The activists climbed to the top of large ship loading machines, and abseiled part-way down structural cables that suspend the loaders over coal ships. The ship loaders can’t be operated without endangering the climbers, who are determined to stay there for as long as possible.

Annika Dean, spokesperson for the protest organisers, Rising Tide Newcastle, explained the group’s motivations: “We are staging an emergency intervention into Australia’s number one cause of global warming.”

“Around the world, the early impacts of unabated global warming are beginning to emerge. 2010 has been a year of tragic weather disasters.”

“Thousands of people have died this year due to flash floods in Pakistan and China, and fires in Siberia. Millions of people are facing starvation due to a devastating drought in west Africa. These are the impacts of global warming that scientists have been warning us about for decades. Global warming is happening now, and it is killing people.”

“Australia is a major contributor to this crisis, due to the massive volumes of coal we export. We are  exporting global warming to the world. With the support of both Labor and the Coalition, Australia’s coal exports are booming. Here in Newcastle, already the world’s biggest coal port, multinational mining corporations are planning to triple exports over the next decade. It’s a similar story at all coal ports in the country.”

“Urgent action against global warming is needed. We have been forced to make our dramatic protest today because the Federal government is failing to take any action.”

“We call on Prime Minister Gillard to step up to the challenge of global warming, put an immediate moratorium on the expansion of the coal industry, and begin to replace this outdated industry with the renewable industries of the future,” concluded Ms Dean.

Check here for updates and timeline as the action continues

Skype: gary.cranston
facebook


Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Sunday, September 26, 2010

FBI Raids Against Anti-War Groups in Minnesota, Chicago

While we knew that the FBI was targeting "eco-terrorists", the charges and raids are being expanded to anti-war and other social justice organizations and networks.

Very disturbing.

* * * * *

In the past few days, the FBI raided the homes of anti-war activists in the midwest US and the executive director of Arab American Advocacy Network. 

Stories:

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/24/fbi.searches/

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/video?id=7688564&syndicate=syndicate&section

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/25/us/politics/25search.html?_r=1

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/sep2010/raid-s25.shtml

Ted Dooley, Kelly's attorney, called the raids "a probe into the political beliefs of American citizens and any organization anywhere that opposes the American imperial design." He said the warrants cited a federal law making it a violation to provide or conspire to provide material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations.

http://www.startribune.com/local/103716104.html?elr=KArksc8P%3APc%3AUthPacyPE7iUiD3aPc%3A_Yyc%3AaUU

http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/metro/feds-raid-homes-in-chicago-minnesota-in-terror-probe-20100924

Video of Community Meeting:


Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

BREAKING: For Immediate Release: Population Control Alarmist Attacks Discovery Channel Headquarters

Folks, this is very alarming. Recently they arrested a man from Tulare County with a fully loaded up truck and his full body armor as he was driving crazy through Oakland highways headed towards the Tides Foundation and the ACLU offices in SF.

Now they hittin up MD.

Cuidado y qu se cuidan. take care of each other. love each other and protect each other.

diana

* * * * *

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                             
September 1, 2010
For more information contact
Jill Garvey 312-266-0319

CHICAGO – Today’s hostage situation at the Discovery Channel’s headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland indicates an alarming re-emergence of racially-tinged population control arguments.

See http://www.newcomm.org/content/view/2146/91/ for full media release.

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism