Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Evo Morales letter on REDD: NATURE, FORESTS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ARE NOT FOR SALE

The word from Bolivia: 

This is interesting as there is a pre-meeting of indigenous peoples this week in Cancun, which some view as a probable attempt to divide the Indigenous Peoples' Caucus on the issue of REDD.

Stay tuned.

--------------------

NATURE, FORESTS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ARE NOT 
FOR SALE  

 

Indigenous brothers of the world:  

 

I am deeply concerned because some pretend to use leaders and indigenous 
groups to promote the commoditization of nature and in particular of forest 
through the establishment of the REDD mechanism (Reduction Emissions from 
Deforestation and Degradation) and its versions REDD+ REDD++.  
Every day an extension of forests and rainforest equivalent to 36,000 football 
fields disappears in the world.  Each year 13 million hectares of forest and rain 
forest are lost. At this rate, the forests will disappear by the end of the century.  
The forests and rainforest are the largest source of biodiversity. If deforestation 
continues, thousands of species, animals and plants will be lost forever. More 
than three quarters of accessible fresh water zones come from uptake zones in 
forests, hence the worsening of water quality when the forest condition 
deteriorates. Forests provide protection from flooding, erosion and natural 
disasters.  They provide non-timber goods as well as timber goods. Forests are 
a source of natural medicines and healing elements not yet discovered. Forests 
and the rainforest are the lungs of the atmosphere.  18% of all emissions of 
greenhouse gases occurring in the world are caused by deforestation.  
 
It is essential to stop the destruction of our Mother Earth.  

 

Currently, during climate change negotiations everyone recognizes that it is 
essential to avoid the deforestation and degradation of the forest. However, to 
achieve this, some propose to commoditize forests on the false argument 
that only what has a price and owner is worth taking care of.  
Their proposal is to consider only one of the functions of forests, which is 
its ability to absorb carbon dioxide, and issue "certificates", "credits" or 
"Carbon rights" to be commercialized in a carbon market.  This way, 
companies of the North have the choice of reducing their emissions or buy 
“REDD certificates" in the South according to their economic convenience.  
 For example, if a company has to invest USD40 or USD50 to reduce the 
emission of one ton of C02 in a "developed country",  they would prefer to buy a 
"REDD certificate" for USD10 or  USD20 in a "developing country", so they can 
they say they have fulfilled to reduce the emissions of the mentioned ton of 
CO2.   
Through this mechanism, developed countries will have handed their obligation 
to reduce their emissions to developing countries, and the South will once 
again fund the North and that same northern company will have saved a lot of 
money by buying "certified" carbon from the Southern forests.  
However, they will not only have cheated their commitments to reduce 
emissions, but they will have also begun the commoditization of nature
with the forests 

 

The forests will start to be priced by the CO2 tonnage they are able to absorb. 
The "credit" or "carbon right" which certifies that absorptive capacity will be 
bought and sold like any commodity worldwide. To ensure that no one affects 
the ownership of “REDD certificates” buyers, a series of restrictions will be put 
into place, which will eventually affect the sovereign right of countries and 
indigenous peoples over their forests and rainforests. So begins a new stage 
of privatization of nature never seen before which will extend to water, 
biodiversity and what they call “environmental services".   
While we assert that capitalism is the cause of global warming and the 
destruction of forests, rainforests and Mother Earth, they seek to expand 
capitalism to the commoditization of nature with the word “green 
economy".  

 

To get support for this proposal of commoditization of nature, some financial 
institutions, governments, NGOs, foundations, "experts" and trading 
companies are offering a percentage of the "benefits" of this 
commoditization of nature to indigenous peoples and communities living in 
native forests and the rainforest.  

 

Nature, forests and indigenous peoples are not for sale.  

 

For centuries, Indigenous peoples have lived conserving and preserving natural 
forests and rainforest. For us the forest and rainforest are not objects, are not 
things you can price and privatize. We do not accept that native forests and 
rainforest be reduced to a simple measurable quantity of carbon. Nor do 
we accept that native forests be confused with simple plantations of a 
single or two tree species. The forest is our home, a big house where plants, 
animals, water, soil, pure air and human beings coexist.  

 

It is essential that all countries of the world work together to prevent forest and 
rainforest deforestation and degradation. It is an obligation of developed 
countries, and it is part of its climate and environmental debt climate, to 
contribute financially to the preservation of forests, but NOT through its 
commoditization. There are many ways of supporting and financing developing 
countries, indigenous peoples and local communities that contribute to  
the preservation of forests.  

 

Developed countries spend tens of times more public resources on defense, 
security and war than in climate change. Even during the financial crisis many 
have maintained and increased their military spending.  It is inadmissible that 
by using the needs communities have and the ambitions of some leaders 
and indigenous "experts", indigenous peoples are expected to be 
involved with the commoditization of nature.  
 
All forests and rainforests protection mechanisms should guarantee indigenous 
rights and participation, but not because indigenous participation is 
achieved in REDD, we can accept that a price for forests and rainforests is 
set and negotiated in a global carbon market. 
Indigenous brothers, let us not be confused. Some tell us that the carbon 
market mechanism in REDD will be voluntary. That is to say that whoever wants 
to sell and buy, will be able, and whoever does not want to, will be able to stand 
aside.  We cannot accept that, with our consent, a mechanism is created 
where one voluntarily sells Mother Earth while others look crossed 
handed  
 
Faced with the reductionist views of forests and rainforest commoditization, 
indigenous peoples with peasants and social movements of the world must fight 
for the proposals that emerged of the World People's Conference on Climate 
Change and the Rights of Mother Earth: 

 

1) Integrated management of native forests and rainforest not only considering 
its mitigation function as CO2 sink but all its functions and potentiality, whilst 
avoiding confusing them with simple plantations.  

 

2) Respect the sovereignty of developing countries in their integral management 
of forests.  

 

3) Full compliance with the Rights of Indigenous Peoples established by the 
United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Convention No. 
169 of the ILO and other international instruments; recognition and respect to 
their territories; revalorization and implementation of indigenous knowledge for 
the preservation of forests;  indigenous peoples participation and indigenous 
management of forest and rainforest.  

 

4) Funding of developed countries to developing countries and indigenous 
peoples for integral management of forest as part of their climate and 
environmental debt. No establishment of any mechanism of carbon markets or 
"incentives" that may lead to the commoditization of forests and rainforest.  

 

5) Recognition of the rights of Mother Earth, which includes forests, rainforest 
and all its components.  In order to restore harmony with Mother Earth, putting a 
price on nature is not the way but to recognize that not only human beings have 
the right to life and to reproduce, but nature also has a right to life and to 
regenerate, and that without Mother Earth Humans cannot live.  

 

Indigenous brothers, together with our peasant brothers and social movements 
of the world, we must mobilize so that the conclusions of Cochabamba are 
assumed in Cancun and to impulse a mechanism of RELATED ACTIONS TO 
THE FORESTS based on these five principles, while always maintaining high 
the unity of indigenous peoples and the principles of respect for Mother Earth, 
which for centuries we have preserved and inherited from our ancestors. 

 

 

EVO MORALES AYMA 

President of the Plurinational State of Bolivia 

Posted via email from Decolonizing Environmentalism

No comments: